William H. “Bo” Bowman, III, concentrates his practice in the area of insurance and corporate defense litigation. He has prosecuted or defended civil jury trials in courts of general jurisdiction including trucking and transportation, premises liability, automobile liability, contract disputes, watercraft liability, insurance coverage disputes, and general civil and commercial litigation cases. Bo has been a member of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel since 1997.
Judge Matthew J. Perry Civility Award, 2012 Recipient
GEICO Partnership Excellence Award, 2008
“Declaratory Judgment Actions to Resolve Automobile Coverage Disputes,” from Basic Insurance Law Continuing Legal Education Seminar; cited in THE LAW OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE IN SOUTH CAROLINA, South Carolina Bar Association Continuing Legal Education, 5th Ed., 2002.
Williams v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 409 S.C. 586, 762 S.E.2d 705 (2014)
Evans v. Stewart, 370 S.C. 522, 636 S.E.2d 632 (Ct. App. 2006).
Williams v. Selective Ins. Co. of Se., 315 S.C. 532, 446 S.E.2d 402 (1994).
Boozer v. Boozer, 300 S.C. 282, 387 S.E.2d 674 (Ct. App. 1988).
Hubbs v. Gov’t Emps. Ins. Co., 287 S.C. 579, 340 S.E.2d 532 (1986).
Brown v. Howell, 284 S.C. 605, 327 S.E.2d 659 (Ct. App. 1985).
CAUTION - Before you proceed, please note: Do not send us any confidential information. By clicking “accept” you agree that our review of the information contained in your e-mail and any attachments will not create an attorney-client relationship between you and any lawyer in our firm and will not prevent any lawyer in our firm from representing a party in any matter where that information is relevant, even if you submitted the information in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if that information is highly confidential and could be used against you. Our firm collects debts for mortgage lenders and other creditors. Any information you convey to us will be used for that purpose. However, if you have previously received a discharge in bankruptcy, our response to you should not be construed as an attempt to collect a debt but only as an effort to respond to your inquiry or to enforce a lien against the property.